|
|
Post by Bryce-KC on Mar 22, 2018 13:17:18 GMT
For those that have played OOTP in the last few years, your owner sets goals for you, they can be to resign a player, hit a certain attendance marker, or performance goal etc. Achieving the goal makes your owner happy, and often results in more $$ coming your way. Failing to hit them, can piss him off and see him cut your budget.
My thought is to leave it in, we still want some sense of having to appease our boss; but I'm not dead set on this. So what do you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by EricFerr - TEX on Mar 22, 2018 13:27:06 GMT
Truthfully doesn't matter to me. I voted no just because sometimes the goals go against what you are trying to achieve.
|
|
|
|
Post by Larry - Mets on Mar 22, 2018 13:57:01 GMT
I voted no for basically the same reason. My "owner" wanted me to sign someone to a LTC that I didn't want to.
Larry
New York Mets
|
|
|
|
Post by BlueJaysGM-Ryan on Mar 22, 2018 18:39:25 GMT
honestly voted no just because LOL.. rookie OOTP player here
|
|
|
|
Post by twinkiefan al on Mar 22, 2018 18:49:02 GMT
Not sure I will have the guy that's part of the goal. So why bother.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bryce-KC on Mar 22, 2018 18:51:59 GMT
Majority hit. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fish-Nats on Mar 22, 2018 22:07:23 GMT
Yeah prefer to turn it off, my luck Loria would buy the Nats. Then again, firing Baker after 190+ wins I’m just 2 seasons is kind of ridiculous on the other end of the spectrum.
(If there are Nats fans, I haven’t read much about it so perhaps there were other reasons)
|
|
